Rules of Writing Fiction, IMHO (in order of importance): 1. Reader must be [entertained/uplifted/sad/furious/FEEL SOMETHING]. 2. Reader must understand what is happening.
Everything else—and that includes grammar, punctuation, etc. etc—is a supporting element. You can take them or leave them according to how well they serve Rules 1 and 2.
Dirty Sci-Fi Buddha 
Good writing should always make you FEEL SOMETHING. I love it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! 🙂 What’s the use of art that doesn’t move? That “art” just becomes a monument to the dead worship of doctrine and tradition!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rule 3: Readers eyes must bleed as their mind explodes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah man forgot the most important one, hahaha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nah! I don’t agree! How can I make the reader feel what I want him to feel if I don’t use proper grammar and punctuation ! Punctuation! It can alter the entire meaning of a sentence. So if the sentence doesn’t mean what I want it to how will the reader feel what I want him/her to! I mean I have made errors while writing too…some I just couldn’t spot while proofreading. But I wouldn’t not make it a priority intentionally !
LikeLiked by 2 people
Understandable! But before we get into a semantic debate, I’d argue the definition of “proper punctuation.” Right now I’m digging into Stephen King. He uses run on sentences, whole paragraphs that are just one uncapitalized, italicized word in parenthesis, and all kinds of creative twists. If you want to see horrible grammar/great storytelling try inspecting Marcus Sakey’s best selling Brilliance saga. Long story short: I feel that it’s important to be able to write a good essay to understand basic written communication, but in order to send your reader tailspinning into another dimension, you have to be willing to break the rules. Not all the time, just when it (ironically) communicates the story better. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
haha I love Stephen King and thanks for the reco. I will definitely check out Sakey! I agree with you as well. I guess I haven’t reached that point where I could ignore the red lines under my words for creativity. I think it’s an OCD. haha
LikeLiked by 1 person
No it’s best to be conservative in these matters. I totally understand! I mean, if your reader doesn’t understand what’s going on, then you damn sure better be making them feel INTENSELY, you know what I mean? I’ve had people recommend movies like Silver Linings Playbook and Life of Pi to me when they didn’t understand any of why things happened the way they did but they were so beautifully done that it didn’t matter. So I think as long as a writer is focused on truly having their reader enjoy the experience, then it’s ok! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t tell you how many books I’ve read that have lacked #1. You come away not remembering much of the story and *feeling* super disappointed because of the story!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Grammatic structure is a transient creation for our day and age; how grammatically correct are the literary works from a thousand years ago, right? They don’t even spell the same way we do; what is important (and here I’m just agreeing more firmly with you, haha!) is that the story touches the audience’s spirit.
LikeLike
Feeling it. Emotion is art. It’s a frisson mission.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha absolutely!!! (BTW, what’s “frisson?”)
LikeLike
Frisson is a french word that seeks to define the sensation of chills and goosebumps triggered by a powerful rush of emotion. I’ve loved art that could do that my whole life, but I never knew what to call it until recently. In terms of art, I’m on a frisson mission.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Frisson Mission! A phrase worthy of a movement! 🙂
LikeLike
I agree. Rules should be broken. But why do we still learn it then?
LikeLiked by 1 person
In order to know at what times they’re useful and what times they should be broken. Know your enemy…and your allies. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person