When “whatever works” gets consistently re-interpreted into “whatever feels good”…
Then it doesn’t work, and it stops feeling good.
When “whatever works” gets consistently re-interpreted into “whatever feels good”…
Then it doesn’t work, and it stops feeling good.
You have described the seed that grows into degeneracy and pointless suffering quite well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks bruh. Ironically, I’ve fallen prey to it myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can tell. Your references to pornography use and other things of that nature resonate with me. Stay in the fight. Stay tuned for a new article in the next few minutes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow so true ❤️
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
For me, what works is what provides the best chance of feeling good over the longer term. Pleasure, in the absence of detriment to ourselves and others, is healing and aligns us with our capacity for loving generosity. Suffering sometimes has to be accepted in order to avoid a greater suffering, but it does make us turn our attention towards our self – i.e. makes us selfish. I think it is important to distinguish between pleasure and addiction. Degeneracy is what happens when we lose access to healthy pleasures and try to replace them with something which gives diminishing returns.
I suppose there is always an open question in the “whatever works” philosophy. How do we define “works”? What is our objective? It makes a difference whether our objective is to become rich, conquer an empire, serve our fellow humans, become famous, etc. We can assess our actions by whether they have brought us closer to our objective, but “works” doesn’t, in itself, imply a particular objective.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It doesn’t have to, in a non-specific context. The implication then becomes what works for the individual, which requires the individual to study themselves, to never turn away from the unpleasant truths that most will try and ignore, a key premise in modern psychology. In this way, the idea of functionality mirrors up with mystical premises; without knowing oneself, without studying one’s own tendencies through the evidence, then dissonance is guaranteed.
LikeLike
Dissonance is the motivation to know ourselves. Dissonance is unpleasant. Thus the impulse to know ourselves is driven by the motive of minimising displeasure and maximising pleasure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think your stated premise is valid but unbalanced. Dissonance is ONE of the motivations to know ourselves. Harmony is another. In the absence of dissonance, one can ditch simple reactiveness to unpleasant stimuli and proactively seek harmony. This to me, is far preferable, and one of the best ways to express discipline.
LikeLike
Isn’t harmony simply the absence of dissonance, which is the same thing as saying dissonance is the absence of harmony?
For me, one of the motives for seeking self-knowledge is to minimise the need for discipline. The more we find inner harmony and integrity the less easily we are disturbed and the more our reactions to the world around us constitute a spontaneous creative improvisation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wouldn’t say so—to me, harmony is a state where chaos and order exist in balance, where there is enough order to facilitate safety and some level of positive cause and effect, and there is enough chaos to facilitate learning and growth. I’d say there is always a need for discipline—which is being able to set aside immediate gratification in order to bargain with the future—but not so much willpower, which is what I think your statement alludes to. Knowing oneself—and consequently, what one is willing to work for—allows the employment of discipline to be a simple, logical choice which is largely devoid of willpower, in my opinion.
LikeLike
I use the “whatever works”approach only when I’m at the end of my rope and can’t think of anything better then the hazard solution that materialized.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. I use it to gain ground as fast as I can, and allow me the luxury of spontaneity and audacious action, because if I have done it right, I have ensured that I am flowing with the pace of evolution and have a chance to try and temporarily outpace entropy.
LikeLike
Entropy invites order, order invites entropy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ironically, being able to reliably instantiate order allows one a greater ability to reside in a harmonious state—when both order and entropy exist in a balance that propagates fulfillment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
1. Wrote first draft of 2nd volume of series- felt really good about it.
2. Re-read draft- decided it needed tinkering, but still felt good.
3. Tinkering revealed structural weakness in narrative; half of the book collapsed- felt…..unhappy (well actually other words…but let us not dwell too much on Gunnery Sergeant Hartman of ‘Full Metal Jacket’).
4. Grumbling, muttering, set to work. More grumbling, muttering AND more work.
5. Entire re-write is starting to ‘work.
6. Stopped feeling ‘good’, replaced it with ‘determined’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha! 1st 10% (drafting): super cool. 10%-80% (initial editing): horrible. 80-90% (intermediate editing), when the story begins to take shape: cool again. 90-100% (final edits): so damn bored and sick of my story that my eyes are bleeding.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep that sounds familiar!
LikeLiked by 1 person