There’s a gigantic difference between “Do what works” and “Do what feels good.” The first approach is functionality based; it requires constant, brutally honest assessment (so I can check my stances, make sure they’re still relevant, and also so I can ensure that I’m behaving ethically). The second approach—while able to deliver results—can easily be hijacked by confirmation bias and desire to indulge, incentivizing me to justify lack of results with outdated philosophies: modalities that appeal to my emotions but completely neglect function.
But hey, I’m free to do whatever I want, right? 😉 (personally, although the first approach may not always “feel good,” I find it more fulfilling in the long term)


Leave a reply to Mel Gutiér Cancel reply