Recently, I was pondering the structure of a mystical, Alan Watts-style reality (an omnipotent/present/scient consciousness imposes the illusion of individuality and space-time upon itself, so it can experience linear progression, and thus narrative, learning, motion, and evolution, because in its native omnipotent/present/scient state, it can’t experience linear phenomena like motion, progress, or choice, because it is everything everywhere all at once, so it has nowhere to go, nothing to become or overcome, nothing to learn, etc. etc., and so it is limited unless it experiences itself from constrained individual, space-time-bound perspectives).
I realized the model that resonated with me was that of a tree. The trunk is nonduality in its native state (omnipotent/present/scient), while a branch is the higher or deeper self.
The branch is defined by generalized goals, direct access to nondual power, but can’t fully interface with logical/linear specifics because it has one foot in space-time-individuality, the other in nonduality; it’s primary purpose is to orchestrate the realization of its goals (desire to live certain themes) without the confusion and peskiness of having to deal with space-time-individuality immersion. Its defining intent, as a branch, is to grow toward the sun (realize certain themes).
Our surface/conscious selves would be the leaves growing from the branch, and since we all sprout at different points, we must all find our own unique way to the sun. Unpleasantness arises when we decide to grow downward, crimping our design and the flow of nondual power from the trunk to the branch to the leaf. Eventually, if the leaf persists in defying the branch and trunk, it will wither away, but that’s not a loss, because the branch will sprout new leaves to either try again or move on to a different adventure (reincarnation).
Of course, that’s all scientifically unprovable. But given the premise of a mystically constructed reality, the tree model seems to explain the multiple aspects of self, and their respective roles in the breadth of existence (at least to me).