Musings

Perhaps we are born with internal guidance–a compass that transcends external metrics, that can guide us through societal standards, and let us know when to conform or diverge. Perhaps fulfillment isn’t dependent on chasing metric after metric, checking off box after box, and is more a function of conscious allowance: settling into the present moment, and letting this guidance make itself known.

If that’s the case, I believe it could be simultaneously individualist and egalitarian–it could give each individual customized guidance, while imbuing everyone in the collective with equal capability to live a fulfilling life. This possibility, more than anything else, makes that premise particularly attractive to me. For in its breadth, it holds the promise of true abundance–one based on an abundance of possibility–which allows for improbabilities (and perhaps seeming impossibilities) to exist without reflexive dismissal.

Musings

Many seem intent on condemning themselves, even though they’re with that same self every hour of every day; through ingestion, excretion, every second of sleep, and in other private moments. No one but you sees the entirety of your existence, from mundane to profound to exciting to routine.

I’d rather not spend energy beating myself up, especially since I’m with myself 24/7. In my opinion, that’s working against my own intentions–it’s like needlessly tensing an opposing muscle, when I’m actively trying to contract its counterpart. I understand the need for introspection and course correction, but all too often in my past, I let that spiral into self-flagellation.

Musings

My view of abundance is that it isn’t just about resources and time, but an abundance of possibility–I believe good can become bad, but more importantly, that bad can become good.

Practically, that boils down to staying present and open, so my creativity, imagination, and spontaneous inspiration can sync with my perception and plans. Instead of restricting myself with preconceived stories about how it has to be, or how it’s going to be, I like to remain conscious of potential and flow.

Musings

I used to put great weight in originality, until I realized everything is original by default. (Even if there’s seemingly a repetitive event, nothing has occurred in the exact same universal configuration of particles and energy). So i shifted focus to whether something felt personally engaging–whether its tone and delivery sparked inspiration and resonance. Who cares if something is original, if it’s completely lifeless and devoid of spirit?

Maybe everything has happened before. Maybe it hasn’t. I’m not concerned. I’ll leave the tallying, scorekeeping, and justifying to someone more fussy.

Musings

How much do I want to loathe and condemn, in search of an abstract promised land that hides behind unending problems, supposedly deserving of my unending hate?

I hope not as much as I want to be present, and framing our transient and mysterious existence as adventure, opportunity, and healthy engagement with growth and challenge. Because that’s how I experience the most fulfillment.

Musings

For much of my life, I reveled in the seeming power of righteous anger, channeling my intellect and creativity into fiery condemnations. After a while, I began to notice the toll it took on my sleep and well-being, paired with a nonstop churn of dissatisfaction and lack. And then I decided I wasn’t meant to live that way, that I’m worth more than that. While anger must be felt and processed, I no longer believe it must be deliberately inflamed, through constant definition, categorization, and judgment. I can feel that rage, make peace with it, allow it to reintegrate, and get back to doing something productive.

Musings

I’ve paid all kinds of tributes in the quest for fulfillment. Time, money, pain, worry…as the years pass, I’ve become increasingly convinced that it’s more about letting myself relax into the present moment, rather than forcing the present moment to fit into preconceived criteria.

Musings

Suppose (despite shorter-term appearances), existence is neither transactional nor hierarchical, and separation is an illusion designed to allow an omnipotent/present/scient benevolence to have linear experiences from infinite perspectives (because if it remained confined to its native omnipotence/presence/science it would be everything everywhere all at once, and would have nowhere to go, nothing to learn, nothing to become, and nothing to overcome).

If existence is mystical and transcendental, maybe we’re the equivalent of leaves (space-time-bound perspectives), sprouting from branches (higher/deeper selves, unbound by linearity, but still guided by desire for specific experiences) connected to the trunk (the omnipotent/present/scient core).

If that’s the case, I might be engaged in an experiential game (hide and seek, if you will), between myself and Myself. In any given round, the challenge would be to realize it’s a game, using clues left by Myself. Then–since I’m navigating a specific experience as a unique individual–I would try and figure out my own unique way to harmonize with my deeper aspects.

Musings

Given the premise there are deeper, more powerful aspects of us that come to the fore when the conscious mind experiences harmonious alignment, I like to think of present-moment focus (which also seems to trigger unforced well-being), of internal peace and emptiness, as a paradoxical avenue to greater control. Paradoxical because it may logically/outwardly appear to be conscious surrender, but existentially, it allows the entirety of my being–conscious and otherwise–to exert full control over the reins of my life.

Musings

Recently, I was pondering the structure of a mystical, Alan Watts-style reality (an omnipotent/present/scient consciousness imposes the illusion of individuality and space-time upon itself, so it can experience linear progression, and thus narrative, learning, motion, and evolution, because in its native omnipotent/present/scient state, it can’t experience linear phenomena like motion, progress, or choice, because it is everything everywhere all at once, so it has nowhere to go, nothing to become or overcome, nothing to learn, etc. etc., and so it is limited unless it experiences itself from constrained individual, space-time-bound perspectives).

I realized the model that resonated with me was that of a tree. The trunk is nonduality in its native state (omnipotent/present/scient), while a branch is the higher or deeper self.

The branch is defined by generalized goals, direct access to nondual power, but can’t fully interface with logical/linear specifics because it has one foot in space-time-individuality, the other in nonduality; it’s primary purpose is to orchestrate the realization of its goals (desire to live certain themes) without the confusion and peskiness of having to deal with space-time-individuality immersion. Its defining intent, as a branch, is to grow toward the sun (realize certain themes).

Our surface/conscious selves would be the leaves growing from the branch, and since we all sprout at different points, we must all find our own unique way to the sun. Unpleasantness arises when we decide to grow downward, crimping our design and the flow of nondual power from the trunk to the branch to the leaf. Eventually, if the leaf persists in defying the branch and trunk, it will wither away, but that’s not a loss, because the branch will sprout new leaves to either try again or move on to a different adventure (reincarnation).

Of course, that’s all scientifically unprovable. But given the premise of a mystically constructed reality, the tree model seems to explain the multiple aspects of self, and their respective roles in the breadth of existence (at least to me).